🔍🔩 Parts bench
19 lessons

Gears: Trading Speed for Strength

A motor's speed is a currency, and the gearbox is the exchange booth: ten turns in, one turn out, tenfold the torque — minus a little friction, plus a little wobble called backlash.

lesson 3 of 3 in this unit

Builds on: 1.1 DC Motors: Fast, Weak and Hungry

Same idea, other course:Vector: work and power, the currency itself

The exchange rate

Mesh a small gear with a big one and count teeth. A 10-tooth gear driving a 50-tooth gear must turn five times for one output turn — that is a gear ratio of 5:1. The output is five times slower and, in the ideal case, five times stronger:

speed ÷ ratio · torque × ratiosame power in a new denomination — physics charges only a small friction fee

This is why a bare DC motor — thousands of RPM, doorknob torque — becomes useful the moment a gearbox translates it: a 100:1 reduction turns 6000 RPM of whir into 60 RPM of confident shove. Power (speed × torque) is conserved through the box; only its shape changes. Nothing is free: each meshing stage eats a few percent to friction.

Backlash: the space between the teeth

Meshed teeth need a whisker of clearance to roll without jamming — and that whisker is backlash: reverse the input and the output stands still for a moment while the teeth cross the gap. For wheels, harmless. For a robot arm reversing direction at a target, it is a dead zone where the joint ignores you — and no controller downstream can fully undo a lie in the mechanism itself.

The fixes are mechanical and priced accordingly: tighter gears, split anti-backlash gears, belt drives (the belt’s tension takes up the slack), or the exotic gearboxes in industrial arm joints — engineered specifically to make the gap tiny.

Sizing a drivetrain, roughly

The bench-top recipe: find the torque the task needs (weight × lever arm, then double it for margin), find your motor’s comfortable torque, and gear down by the ratio between them. Speed is what remains — if the geared-down speed is too slow for the job, the motor is too small, and no ratio will save it.

Why not direct drive everything?

Big, slow, gearless motors exist — and where budgets allow, they are glorious: zero backlash, perfect back-drivability, silent. Their price and weight are why the rest of the world runs on small fast motors plus gears. Every drivetrain is this same trade, settled at a different budget.

⚗️ Lab — The Exchange Booth

A motor, a two-gear train with an adjustable ratio, and a load to lift. Meters for speed, torque and what the friction fee cost you.

  • Raise the ratio and watch the output slow while its torque multiplies — the load that stalled at 1:1 lifts easily at 20:1.
  • Reverse the motor and watch the output hesitate — the backlash gap, in slow motion. Tighten it and see the dead zone shrink.
  • Find the smallest ratio that lifts the heavy load. Note what happened to your lifting speed.
5:1
0.6 N·m
2.0°
Verdict
stalls — gear down further
Trade
speed ÷ 5, torque × 5
Dead zone on reversal
2.0°

Work it by hand — 0 / 2

No multiple choice here: compute the value and type it. Suffixes like 2.5k or 20m are understood; answers within ±2% count.

1. A motor spins at 6000 RPM behind a 30:1 gearbox. What is the output speed, in RPM?
2. The motor delivers 0.05 N·m. Ignoring friction, what torque leaves that 30:1 gearbox, in N·m?

Check your understanding

1. A 12-tooth gear drives a 60-tooth gear. The output turns…

2. Backlash is…

3. Why can't a clever control algorithm fully compensate backlash?

4. Your geared-down mechanism finally has enough torque but is now far too slow. The honest conclusion is…