Newton's Three Laws: The Operating System

Motion doesn't need a cause — changes in motion do. Three sentences from 1687 that still run every machine, sport and orbit.

lesson 1 of 3 in this unit

Builds on: 0.2 Acceleration: When Velocity Itself Changes

First law: motion is free

Aristotle thought moving things naturally stop, and everyday life agrees — stop pedalling and you coast to a halt. Newton’s first law says the opposite: an object keeps its velocity — including zero — unless a net force acts on it. Things around you stop because friction and drag act on them, not because stopping is natural. Take the forces away (an air-hockey puck, a probe in deep space) and motion simply continues, for free, forever.

The property of “keeping on” is inertia, and mass is its measure. This is why you lurch forward when a bus brakes: the bus got a force, you didn’t — you just kept going.

Second law: the exchange rate

F = m·anewtons = kilograms × metres per second squared

The second law prices the change: how much acceleration a force buys depends on the mass in the way. Twice the force, twice the acceleration; twice the mass, half. Read it in both directions — engineers use it to compute forces from measured accelerations just as often as the reverse. And note what it quietly says: zero net force means zero acceleration, not zero motion — the first law is the second law’s special case.

“Net” is load-bearing. Forces add with their signs: a 500 N push against 480 N of friction is a 20 N net force, and the acceleration comes from the 20.

Third law: forces come in pairs

Push a wall and the wall pushes you back, exactly as hard, in the opposite direction — always, with no exceptions and no delay. Forces are interactions, and an interaction grabs both parties. Walking is pushing the Earth backwards; swimming is throwing water behind you; a rocket climbs by hurling gas down. The partner forces act on different objects, which is why they don’t cancel: the ground’s push on you moves you, your push moves the planet (immeasurably).

The horse-and-cart paradox

“If the cart pulls back on the horse as hard as the horse pulls the cart, how does anything move?” — because the cart’s motion is decided only by forces on the cart: the horse’s pull forward versus the ground’s friction backward. The cart’s pull on the horse belongs to the horse’s ledger. Keep separate books per object and the paradox evaporates.

⚗️ Lab — Force vs. Cart

One cart, a push force, adjustable friction — and the second law doing the arithmetic.

  • Set friction to zero and give a short push: the cart never stops. That’s the first law, visible.
  • Double the force at fixed mass and read the acceleration. Then double the mass instead.
  • Match the push to the friction exactly: net zero, steady speed — moving without accelerating.
40 N
20 kg
10 N
Net force
30 N
Acceleration
1.50 m/s²
Speed after 3 s (from rest)
4.5 m/s

Work it by hand — 0 / 2

No multiple choice here: compute the value and type it. Suffixes like 2.5k or 20m are understood; answers within ±2% count.

1. A 1,200 kg car accelerates at 2.5 m/s². What net force is acting on it, in newtons?
2. You push a 60 kg trolley with 90 N while friction pushes back with 30 N. What is its acceleration, in m/s²?

Check your understanding

1. According to the first law, what does an object do when the net force on it is zero?

2. The same force acts on two boxes; one has twice the mass. The heavier box…

3. You push a wall with 100 N. What does the third law say the wall does?

4. Why don't the third law's paired forces cancel each other out?

5. A rocket in empty space accelerates by…